In partnership with
EVs Are Becoming Software Products. Not Every Company Is Ready for That.
For most of automotive history, buying a car was a one-time transaction. You paid, you drove it home and the product you left the dealership with was the product you owned for the next decade. It got older. It didn't get different.
That model is quietly breaking apart. And the companies that haven't fully understood this yet are the ones showing up in financial trouble reports in early 2026.
The electric vehicle market is consolidating faster than most analysts expected. Several smaller manufacturers are either folding, restructuring, or pulling back from key markets. Meanwhile, Tesla, BYD and a small group of well-capitalized legacy automakers are extending their leads. The standard narrative credits this to scale, price competition and battery economics. Those factors are real. But they're not the whole story.
The cleaner explanation is software.
Tech moves fast, but you're still playing catch-up?
That's exactly why 200K+ engineers working at Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.
Here's what you get:
Curated tech news that shapes your career - Filtered from thousands of sources so you know what's coming 6 months early.
Practical resources you can use immediately - Real tutorials and tools that solve actual engineering problems.
Research papers and insights decoded - We break down complex tech so you understand what matters.
All delivered twice a week in just 2 short emails.
|
How EVs Became Tech Products The shift started with Tesla, which treated its vehicles from the beginning as hardware running software — not machines with a digital display bolted on. The practical result for buyers is that a Tesla purchased in 2022 drives meaningfully differently today because of updates pushed over the air. Autopilot behavior has improved. Energy management has been refined. UI features have been added and removed. In 2026, the markers that separate serious EV players from struggling ones include:
Smaller manufacturers that missed this transition mostly built good hardware. The gap showed up in what happened after the customer drove away. |
The Over-the-Air Gap Is Wider Than It Looks
Most EV manufacturers today will tell you their vehicles support over-the-air updates. That is technically true for many of them. What it means in practice varies enormously.
For some brands, an OTA update fixes a minor bug in the navigation system every few months. For others, it can meaningfully improve range estimates, recalibrate battery charging curves or refine how the drivetrain responds at highway speeds. The difference between those two experiences is not a feature footnote. It defines whether the car gets better over time or simply ages.
Buyers who have owned a Tesla or a late-model BYD for two or three years understand this intuitively. They've watched their car improve. Buyers of some other brands have watched theirs accumulate small annoyances that never get addressed.
|
The Resale Problem Nobody Talks About Software stagnation has a direct resale value consequence. A three-year-old EV that has received consistent, meaningful updates holds its value differently than one that has been functionally static since delivery. As buyers become more educated about this, the OTA track record of a manufacturer is starting to factor into purchase decisions in ways it simply didn't in 2022 or 2023. |
Charging Infrastructure Is Not a Side Feature
Range anxiety gets most of the public conversation about EV adoption. But the quieter barrier for many potential buyers is charging experience, specifically the reliability, speed and availability of fast chargers when they actually need one.
Tesla's Supercharger network has been the most consistently cited advantage in buyer surveys for years. BYD has built out significant infrastructure in its primary markets. What the struggling manufacturers have in common is an over-reliance on third-party charging networks they don't control and can't fix when something goes wrong.
The experience of pulling into a charging station, finding two of four stalls broken and waiting 45 minutes on a slow charger is not a hardware problem. It is a product experience problem. And product experience, like software updates, requires sustained investment and organizational focus that some companies simply haven't prioritized.
|
What the Survivors Have in Common
|
What This Means If You're Buying in 2026
If you are in the market for an EV this year, the spec sheet comparison you're probably doing range, charge time, cargo space, price is still useful. Those numbers matter. But they're now table stakes, not differentiators.
The questions worth adding to your evaluation process are more forward-looking. How has this manufacturer's software improved its existing vehicles over the past two years? What does the OTA update history actually look like? Is the charging network they're pointing you to one they control or one they're hoping works out?
|
Three Questions Worth Asking Before You Buy
|
The Car That Gets Better After You Buy It
The EV market shakeout of 2026 is uncomfortable to watch if you bought a vehicle from a brand now in financial trouble. But the consolidation itself reflects something useful becoming clearer about what an electric vehicle actually is.
It is not a traditional car that happens to run on electricity. It is a software platform that also moves you from place to place. The companies that built it that way from the start are the ones still standing with momentum. The ones that bolted a software layer onto a conventional car development process are the ones hitting walls.
That distinction will matter just as much for the next generation of buyers as range numbers and charging speeds. The car that gets meaningfully better over three years of ownership is worth more than the one with a slightly bigger battery that stays exactly the same.
The market is figuring that out. Slowly but clearly.